By Fitri Awaliyatush Sholihah
As a part of academic community, students are
required to be able to read, think, and argue in certain ways. The students are
also required to be able to understand English both in written and spoken.
Reading comprehension is the most important skill for them because it can
improve their critical thinking skills and it supports the development of other
language skills. As stated by Spears
(2000, p. 5), he defines reading comprehension as the most important skill in
both native and foreign language learning because it demands readers to be
actively mark on the paper, working at constructing meaning by using prior
knowledge that already exist in the brain. It is not only intellectual meaning
may be involved, but also feelings of considerable intensity may be around and
emotional attitudes may be profoundly altered trough reading.
Considering
that English and reading comprehension play a significant role in developing
the quality of human resources, Indonesian government decides that English as
the foreign language must be mastered by the students starting from junior high
school up to tertiary level education such as university students. As stated
above, reading is actually one of the important
subjects for English Education Department students of Islamic University of
Malang. There are reading I until reading IV that must be taken by the
students. This policy is based on curriculum 2008 that has been developed from SK Mendiknas Nomor 232/U/2000 about
guidance of arrangement of university curriculum.
However, the problem of reading
comprehension is experienced by second semester students of English Education
Department of Islamic University of Malang. Many students have low ability in
understanding reading passage. Some factors affect students’ success in reading
comprehension and one of the important factors that must be considered is the
existence of an appropriate instructional reading material.
Instructional
materials are kinds of tools of equipment that can effectively help the
instructor in the theory teaching classroom or in practical assessment.
Allwright (1990, p. 14) states that materials should teach students to learn
that they should be resource books for ideas and activities for instruction in
learning, and that they should give teachers rationales for what they do. It is
clear that the role of instructional reading material is very important in
students’ success in reading comprehension. Finally, realizing students’
problem in reading comprehension, it can be inferred
that the contents of instructional reading material must be evaluated.
According to the evaluation of the
existing instructional reading material which is accommodated in students’
questionnaire, some weaknesses are appeared there. The reading textbook does
not stimulate students’ critical thinking because it provides general topics.
Some of topics are not appropriate for second semester students socially and
psychologically. Furthermore, the textbook does not encourage students to learn
more independently because the topics are not interesting for the students.
Then, the textbook does not provide various exercises or tasks to measure
students’ comprehension when reading the passage. The instruction of the
exercises is mostly unclear. The words used in the passage are regarded difficult
to understand. Therefore, the students often need dictionary to look for the
meaning of the difficult words.
Realizing
the problems arisen in the second semester students of English education
department on reading comprehension, the researcher wants to solve the problems
by developing an appropriate instructional reading material for the students
that can attract students’ interest in reading English. So that, it can improve
students’ ability in reading comprehension. To achieve that, need analysis is
needed to indicate students’ expectation about reading material they expect to
read.
It
is supported by Richard (200, p. 52), he says that need analysis in language
teaching may be used for a number of different purposes, for example to help
determine if an existing course adequately addresses the needs of potential
students, to determine which students from a group are most in need of training
in particular language skills, to identify a gap between what students are able
to do and what they need to be able to do, and to collect information about a
particular problem learners are experiencing, etc.
Developing
instructional reading material is in line with the developing of the text.
Another important aspect in
developing instructional reading material is considering the step in the
development. Tomlinson and Masuhara (2004) propose the steps before developing
the text, they are collect and /or create texts with the potential for
engagement and select the text whether the text likely to engage most of the
target learners cognitively and effectively and whether the target learners
likely to be able to connect the text to their lives. To sharpen students’
comprehension in reading the passage, testing reading comprehension must be
developed in this development. There are several ways of testing reading
comprehension proposed by Richard (2001), they are as follows: matching test,
true/false reading test, multiple-choice test, completion items, rearrangement
items, cloze procedure, open-ended and miscellaneous items, and cursory reading. In this study, the researcher not only
create the textbook which is consisted of some passage completed by some
exercises, but the researcher also gives the activities including group or pair
work in each units or topics to make the students more active and interesting
while understanding the reading passage.
No comments:
Post a Comment